An essay on spinoza and the concept of god

That is, it is that without which a substance ceases to be. Although Spinoza says in proposition 2 that two substances of different attributes have nothing in common, we are not sure whether or not Spinoza would say that God and the second substance have nothing in common. Second, pantheism can be understood as asserting that God is distinct from the world and its natural contents but nonetheless contained or immanent within them, perhaps in the way in which water is contained in a saturated sponge.

Thus God necessarily exists, since nothing can stop God from existing.

Spinoza vs Descartes on God

The existence of the world is, thus, mathematically necessary. Given the present argument, if God were to not exist then it would be somehow limited by that which does exist.

Spinoza, therefore, explains these emotions—as determined in their occurrence as are a body in motion and the properties of a mathematical figure—just as he would explain any other things in nature.

The six hundred and thirteen precepts of the Torah have nothing to do with blessedness or virtue. We see that all bodies and their states follow necessarily from the essence of matter and the universal laws of physics; and we see that all ideas, including all the properties of minds, follow necessarily from the essence of thought and its universal laws.

And, as uncomfortable as this conclusion might be to some, the essence of science is uncertainty. Now, if God does not exist while some finite things do exist necessarily, then finite things are more powerful than an absolutely infinite thing.

He was dismayed by the way in which Scripture itself was worshipped, by the reverence accorded to the words on the page rather than to the message they conveyed. Although both philosophers employ an ontological argument for the existence and necessity of God the specific nature of God differs greatly with each account.

God does not exist, then by A7 we are also claiming that its essence does not include existence. He might already have been voicing the view expressed later in his Theological-Political Treatise that the civil authorities should suppress Judaism as harmful to the Jews themselves.

Reason, Autonomy and the Good Life, Cambridge: There is nothing holy or sacred about Nature, and it is certainly not the object of a religious experience. An attribute refers to that which is necessary to the essence of a specific substance, as perfection is necessary to the essence of God.

Given these qualities one can draw a connection to the omniscient, eternal, creator God of Judeo-Christian interpretation. First, the prophets were not men of exceptional intellectual talents—they were not, that is, naturally gifted philosophers—but simply very pious, even morally superior individuals endowed with vivid imaginations.

There is some debate in the literature about whether God is also to be identified with Natura naturata. Not even Descartes believed that we could know all of Nature and its innermost secrets with the degree of depth and certainty that Spinoza thought possible.

Spinoza's understanding of substance differs from Descartes in two aspects. As to the question of what God, the exemplar of true life, really is, whether he is fire, or spirit, or light, or thought, or something else, this is irrelevant to faith.

I knew a wonderful man named Karl Hess. A substance is prior in nature to its affections. This can be seen directly from Axiom 3 of The Ethics: For if it did not fall to that end, God willing it, how could so many circumstances have concurred by chance for often many circumstances do concur at once?

For example, one substance may have attributes X and Y while another substance might have attributes X and Z. Then, prove that there is a substance with infinite attributes i.Spinoza vs Descartes on God Essay Words | 15 Pages. Abstract and Referential Ontology: Descartes Versus Spinoza on the Existence of God.

The concept of God is central to the development of Cartesian and Spinozan philosophy. Abstract and Referential Ontology: Descartes Versus Spinoza on the Existence of God.

Spinoza vs. Leibniz on God’s Existence essay

The concept of God is central to the development of Cartesian and Spinozan philosophy. Although both philosophers employ an ontological argument for the existence and necessity of God the specific nature of God differs greatly with each account. Baruch Spinozas Argument In Ethics Philosophy Essay.

Print Reference this.

Spinoza's God, Individual Choice and Society

Disclaimer: Spinoza believes that God must exist. In order to defend this claim he goes on to assert that God is a substance and that existence is part of the idea of substance. It is really just an investigation into the concept of substance. If a substance. Spinoza vs Descartes on God Essay Words | 15 Pages.

Spinoza's Concept on one Substance

Abstract and Referential Ontology: Descartes Versus Spinoza on the Existence of God. The concept of God is central to the development of Cartesian and Spinozan philosophy. The concept of God is central to the development of Cartesian and Spinozan philosophy.

Although both philosophers employ an ontological argument for the existence and necessity of God the specific nature of God differs greatly with each account.

Essay: Spinoza on the Existence of God

When Spinoza claims in Proposition Two that “Extension is an attribute of God, or God is an extended thing”, he was almost universally—but erroneously—interpreted as saying that God is literally corporeal.

Download
An essay on spinoza and the concept of god
Rated 4/5 based on 52 review